Craig
2004-02-19 16:45:37 UTC
I read that the Allied pre invasion bombardment ceased prematurely to
the invasion, or at least it did not have the effect as expected.
Question. As the concrete gun bunkers were designed to withstand
shelling, was napalm ever considered? I know it was used in the Pacific,
but have not found much info on its use in the ETO. Was it invented
before D-Day? Not enough available in time?
As a direct hit is not required to have napalm work, a hit anywhere near
the front of the bunker would have halted fire for longer than a shell
would have, giving the soldiers a chance to move inland, assuming no
short drops/friendly fire issues.
Craig
--
the invasion, or at least it did not have the effect as expected.
Question. As the concrete gun bunkers were designed to withstand
shelling, was napalm ever considered? I know it was used in the Pacific,
but have not found much info on its use in the ETO. Was it invented
before D-Day? Not enough available in time?
As a direct hit is not required to have napalm work, a hit anywhere near
the front of the bunker would have halted fire for longer than a shell
would have, giving the soldiers a chance to move inland, assuming no
short drops/friendly fire issues.
Craig
--