Discussion:
Dig WW2 TV show
(too old to reply)
Geoffrey Sinclair
2013-03-11 16:30:36 UTC
Permalink
Dig WW2 TV series, by the looks of it meant as 4 episodes
of an hour each less time for advertisements. Featuring Dan
Snow, who says he thought he knew WWII but is now
discovering new things.

Meant for a Canadian audience with that bias, with the usual
problem of pictures chosen on how good the vision is, not how
accurately they match the narration, plus the footage is repeated.

I would assume Mr Snow is mainly interested in the ground war
and confuses casualties with killed. The first episode was so
bad it was funny, leading to a game of spot the biggest error.

The script tends to over state things and prefers Nazi to German
and seems oblivious to a contradiction, while noting scavengers are
a problem the show has divers collect pieces from a ditched B-17.

Episode 1

Claims the Spitfire elliptical wing was unique, ignoring other designs.

Claims in November 1941 there was air cover for Canadian and
US ships off Northern Ireland (but US ships were banned from war
zones until the US entered the war)

Claims the escort was actually providing cover for allied anti
submarine aircraft from German fighters, yet we know the German
fighters had enough trouble reaching London, there were German
bomber attacks against the shipping.

Claims the Spitfire carried 350 rounds of ammunition for 8 guns
and had a 6,000 HP engine.

Claims the UK needed 1 millions tons of supplies each week, pity
then the 1942-4 period saw an average of 500,000 tons per week

Claims it was in December 1942 the Battle of Atlantic "broke wide
open". Part of the episode is a dive on a sunken U-boat as an
illustration.

Claims the type IXc U-boat range 40,000 km, instead of the 11,000
nautical miles given in the standard references.

Flies in a Canso A, the A stands for Amphibian but claims it did not
have wheels in WWII. More than half of the Canadian production
were amphibians.

Episode 2

Claims the B-17 was responsible for over half of all bombs dropped
over Europe

So we have 2.9 million tons of bombs dropped by the allied air
forces, including on North Africa. The USAAF says 1.1 million by
US heavies, which means around 400,000 tons of bombs would
have to be dropped by RAF B-17s, assuming no B-24 dropped
a bomb. (8th AF 972,000, 15th AF 583,000 tons)

Alternatively 1.5 million tons by USAAF, 1.1 million by heavies
around 750 to 800,000 tons by B-17s. Half of all US bombs.

Claims in 1943 UK under relentless German attack, this is the
description for about 70 day bomber, 730 day fighter bomber
and 3,900 night bomber sorties over the course of the year, so
about a tenth of the Bomber Command effort against Germany.

Claims V-1 was a rocket. The visuals are particularly funny,
some V-1s were disguised as Ju87 dive bombers, plus He111,
or else these two types were bombing London in June 1944.

Claims the V-1s killed 23,000 people, which is interesting since
England reports 6,200 killed and 24,200 seriously wounded, with
fewer casualties at Antwerp. This death toll is despite the claim the
bombing campaign all but neutralising the V-1.

In visual terms Allied bombers used against V-1 sites include
C-47s, presumably with people inside throwing grenades. Also
used were Do217 bombers, which must have been a real surprise
to all concerned.

Claims Allied response to V-1 was synthetic AA training, at the
limits of (the then) imagination.

A quick note the Spitfire XII, 100 produced Oct 42 to Sep 43.
In squadron service Feb 43 - Sep 44, also as a communications
aircraft Dec 44 to Jul 45

Claims the Spitfire XII was only a prototype, rushed off lines to
respond to new German weapons like the V-1, no time for R&D
and testing, so had developmental engines, it was far too dangerous
and soon scrapped. Also called an experimental engine, seems not
to know about 740 Fairey Firefly using basically same engine

Gun camera considered reconnaissance camera.

Claims 18,000 Canadian pilots killed in WWII (9,900 Canadian
aircrew killed in Bomber Command)

Episode 3

In Italy. Claims the attack on the Hitler line had Rome as the
ultimate prize, the capture of which the allies believed would
cause the fighting in Italy to stop. No mention of the Gustav
line which was where the allies were at the time. Monte
Cassino fell on 18 May.

The actual allied attack started 11 May and advanced, but no
mention of this in the program which starts on 23 May when the
Canadians attacked, the allies had already advanced around 8
miles in the Canadian area. The French had already breached
the Hitler/Senger line in their sector. Anzio beach head had
started to break out on 23 May threatening German supply lines.
None of this information given.

No mention of the halt at the end of the 1944 campaign season.

Claims a 40 mm AT gun on Churchill, but the 1944 versions
had a 6 pounder or a 75mm.

On to Arnhem, claims all 35,000 Allied paratroops to Arnhem,
where allied intelligence is supposed to claim only a few Hitler
youth on bicycles in area. No mention of allies actually getting to
the bridge, except a line about troops that might have reached it.

Episode 4

Claims D-Day, invasion fleet was 5 or 7,000 warships, try that
many ships counting landing craft. Claims it was the ultimate turning
point of WWII. Claims the Atlantic Wall began construction in 1940
and in 1944 Hitler still could win, the allies needed to invade France.

Claims at 1 am thousands of landing craft were lowered, with 5,000
warships, 1,100 aircraft moving towards Normandy (1,000 aircraft
is about the size of the US Airborne transport fleet or about the size
of the Bomber Command attack force.)

Investigates the E company "Band of Brothers" knock out of that
artillery battery. Claims it was crucial to knock the heavy guns out.

Claims 12,000 of the D-Day assault troops killed, presumably
through the course of the campaign, as opposed to under 12,000
allied casualties, killed, wounded, missing and PoW on 6 June.

Claims the invasion changed of tide of war, then after D-day the
next date mentioned is 25 August, liberation of Paris, then follows
the surrender of Germany.

Then we go to scuttling U-boats and back to the dive scenario used
in episode 1.

Geoffrey Sinclair
Remove the nb for email.
Michael Emrys
2013-03-11 17:15:41 UTC
Permalink
Dig WW2 TV series...
Good lord! [facepalm]
Featuring Dan Snow...
Who, by your account, has not the slightest business being in the
documentary business.

Michael
Padraigh ProAmerica
2013-03-12 03:40:24 UTC
Permalink
Re: Dig WW2 TV show

Group: soc.history.war.world-war-ii Date: Mon, Mar 11, 2013, 1:15pm
From: ***@olypen.com (Michael Emrys)
On 3/11/13 9:30 AM, Geoffrey Sinclair wrote:
Dig WW2 TV series...
Good lord! [facepalm]
Featuring Dan Snow...
Who, by your account, has not the slightest business being in the
documentary business.

=============COMMENT=========

So Canada now has it's own Michael Moore? :)
-----------------------
Michael

--
"I do not trust any Russian. As soon as a Russian worms his way in, all
hell breaks loose."--

Karl Marx
Don Phillipson
2013-03-12 13:26:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
Dig WW2 TV series, by the looks of it meant as 4 episodes
of an hour each less time for advertisements. Featuring Dan
Snow, who says he thought he knew WWII but is now
discovering new things.
Meant for a Canadian audience with that bias, with the usual
problem of pictures chosen on how good the vision is, not how
accurately they match the narration, plus the footage is repeated.
The series seems currently broadcast on BBC-TV cf.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01j72kz/episodes/guide
(but that does not mean it is a BBC production. Broadcasters
nowadays "outsource" plenty of material, i.e. buy from independent
producers they know.) BBC info suggests the series has more
to do with Ireland and archaeology than with Canada.
--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Geoffrey Sinclair
2013-03-13 14:39:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don Phillipson
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
Dig WW2 TV series, by the looks of it meant as 4 episodes
of an hour each less time for advertisements. Featuring Dan
Snow, who says he thought he knew WWII but is now
discovering new things.
Meant for a Canadian audience with that bias, with the usual
problem of pictures chosen on how good the vision is, not how
accurately they match the narration, plus the footage is repeated.
The series seems currently broadcast on BBC-TV cf.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01j72kz/episodes/guide
(but that does not mean it is a BBC production. Broadcasters
nowadays "outsource" plenty of material, i.e. buy from independent
producers they know.)
UK-Canada Co-Production. A 360 Production and Yap Films Inc.
Production, In association with Shaw Media, BBC Northern
Ireland, and Northern Ireland Screen, Canadian film or video
production tax credit

BBC World Wide Sales and Distribution

Episode 1. See if you can pick the theme, excerpts from the
narration, you can also play spot the error

Investigate a Spitfire crash in then neutral Eire, it was flown by a
American pilot, who was supporting Canadian merchant ships,
more than 200 Canadian pilots charged with protecting shipping,
the plane was paid for by a donation by a wealthy Canadian,
the Spitfire was flown by Canada and the allies.

As background a Canadian pilot interviewed.

Snow's grandfather was in the RCN in WWII.

The next segment is diving on a scuttled U-boat. Canada lost
over 70 merchant ships and 1,600 lives to U-boats (total allied
losses over 2,900 ships is mentioned)

As background for the U-boats a crewman who settled in Canada
after the war is interviewed.

We then go to the flying boats, and ignore things like the VLR
B-24s, or any other allied aircraft type. The Canso A they fly
served with the RCN, along for the ride is an ex RCAF crewman

Thanks in large part to the work of the allied flying boats by the summer
of 1944 more than 25,000 Canadian merchant vessels had brought
shipments to the war front.

Next comes a dive on a U-boat victim. Nice footage of Sherman
tanks, which were the main tank of the allied armies and the number
1 medium tank used by the Canadian Army.

The sacrifice of thousands of Canadian and other allied pilots and
sailors will never be forgotten.
Post by Don Phillipson
BBC info suggests the series has more
to do with Ireland and archaeology than with Canada.
Sounds like they are playing down the Canadian angle for British
audiences. It is archaeology, and much of the first episode is set
in Northern Ireland or offshore.

I have no problem with a theme of Canada in WWII, what I do
have a problem with is how incorrect some basic information is
and a narration that does things like describe the Spitfire as
notorious.

Geoffrey Sinclair
Remove the nb for email.
Don Phillipson
2013-03-14 14:38:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
Post by Don Phillipson
The series seems currently broadcast on BBC-TV cf.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01j72kz/episodes/guide
(but that does not mean it is a BBC production. Broadcasters
nowadays "outsource" plenty of material, i.e. buy from independent
producers they know.)
UK-Canada Co-Production. A 360 Production and Yap Films Inc.
Production, In association with Shaw Media, BBC Northern
Ireland, and Northern Ireland Screen, Canadian film or video
production tax credit
Oh dear . . . Shaw Media is a Canadian CATV company, now
a satellite/cable rebroadcaster, thus like most of its competitors
also proprietor or lessee of numerous channels, one being
BBC Canada (whose programming has very much deteriorated
in the last year or two since Shaw took control of this channel.)
Canadian film and TV production is subsidized, and there may
also be incentives for Shaw (and competitors) to coproduce
new material.
--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Andrew Chaplin
2013-03-15 14:13:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don Phillipson
Canadian film and TV production is subsidized, and there may
also be incentives for Shaw (and competitors) to coproduce
new material.
There is. They have to meet Canadian content regulations.
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
Geoffrey Sinclair
2013-03-15 14:57:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don Phillipson
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
UK-Canada Co-Production. A 360 Production and Yap Films Inc.
Production, In association with Shaw Media, BBC Northern
Ireland, and Northern Ireland Screen, Canadian film or video
production tax credit
Oh dear . . . Shaw Media is a Canadian CATV company, now
a satellite/cable rebroadcaster, thus like most of its competitors
also proprietor or lessee of numerous channels, one being
BBC Canada (whose programming has very much deteriorated
in the last year or two since Shaw took control of this channel.)
Canadian film and TV production is subsidized, and there may
also be incentives for Shaw (and competitors) to coproduce
new material.
The English speaking world tends to have subsidies for most TV
and film material, since they have concluded it is the only way to
have local stories make it to air. The large studios Australia built
to attract shoots tended to be subsidised when the local currency
was worth about half a US dollar, now with the local currency
worth more than the US dollar the call is for more subsidies.

US made TV series tend to be sold overseas at marginal cost,
which is well below the cost of local production, then add the
money Hollywood has compared with other content creators.

The show being discussed came across as cheap, the lack of
research is obvious, casting serious doubt on the claim Snow
is a military historian, let alone a WWII one.

The same archive footage is repeated, the show essentially
goes to Northern Ireland to dig up a Spitfire and dive on
U-boat wrecks, plus a B-17 which we are reminded took off
from Canada. Then moves to England and France to dig up
2 more Spitfires using the same basic team, Snow also visits
a V-1 site, Juno beach and Arnhem, then on to Italy. In the
latter cases hooking up with local people doing basic battlefield
archaeology, that is metal detector sort of level. The divers and
the aircraft digs would be the expensive parts.

Probably a main highlight is the Irish Army restoring one of
the Brownings recovered to firing condition, which they state
was mainly routine maintenance, bogs make a good preservative.
Then they let Dan push the remote firing button, so you could
hear the sound of a Browning.

Geoffrey Sinclair
Remove the nb for email.
Bill
2013-03-15 18:42:20 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:57:13 -0400, "Geoffrey Sinclair"
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
The show being discussed came across as cheap, the lack of
research is obvious, casting serious doubt on the claim Snow
is a military historian, let alone a WWII one.
He has a 'first' in Modern History from Oxford.

Where's your degree in Modern History from?
Rich
2013-03-15 21:10:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill
He has a 'first' in Modern History from Oxford.
Where's your degree in Modern History from?
Argumentum ad verecundiam much?
Bob Martin
2013-03-16 16:46:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:57:13 -0400, "Geoffrey Sinclair"
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
The show being discussed came across as cheap, the lack of
research is obvious, casting serious doubt on the claim Snow
is a military historian, let alone a WWII one.
He has a 'first' in Modern History from Oxford.
Where's your degree in Modern History from?
It's results that count, not how many pieces of paper you have.
Bill
2013-03-16 22:39:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Martin
Post by Bill
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:57:13 -0400, "Geoffrey Sinclair"
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
The show being discussed came across as cheap, the lack of
research is obvious, casting serious doubt on the claim Snow
is a military historian, let alone a WWII one.
He has a 'first' in Modern History from Oxford.
Where's your degree in Modern History from?
It's results that count, not how many pieces of paper you have.
That 'first' means that when he took his degree he was one of the top
half dozen people in that subject in the country.
Geoffrey Sinclair
2013-03-17 16:25:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:57:13 -0400, "Geoffrey Sinclair"
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
The show being discussed came across as cheap, the lack of
research is obvious, casting serious doubt on the claim Snow
is a military historian, let alone a WWII one.
He has a 'first' in Modern History from Oxford.
And if the TV show had been submitted as the thesis then result would
probably have been a fail.
Post by Bill
Where's your degree in Modern History from?
Why should that matter? The show has so many errors the statement
I made is quite supportable.

Geoffrey Sinclair
Remove the nb for email.

MANITOBIAN
2013-03-13 04:19:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
Dig WW2 TV series, by the looks of it meant as 4 episodes
of an hour each less time for advertisements. Featuring Dan
Snow, who says he thought he knew WWII but is now
discovering new things.
Meant for a Canadian audience with that bias, with the usual
problem of pictures chosen on how good the vision is, not how
accurately they match the narration, plus the footage is repeated.
Why would you claim that this was meant for a Canadian audience??
Are Canadians totally ignorant about WW I and WW II history?
Are Australians ignorant of WW I and WW II history?
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
I would assume Mr Snow
Who and what is this Mr. Snow?
Geoffrey Sinclair
2013-03-13 14:38:52 UTC
Permalink
"MANITOBIAN" <***@mts.net> wrote in message news:8e7bb27d-dff8-4b12-ba57-***@googlegroups.com...

Hello Robert, wondered when you would fall in.
Post by MANITOBIAN
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
Dig WW2 TV series, by the looks of it meant as 4 episodes
of an hour each less time for advertisements. Featuring Dan
Snow, who says he thought he knew WWII but is now
discovering new things.
Meant for a Canadian audience with that bias, with the usual
problem of pictures chosen on how good the vision is, not how
accurately they match the narration, plus the footage is repeated.
Why would you claim that this was meant for a Canadian audience??
From the many references to Canada all through the program.
Are Canadians totally ignorant about WW I and WW II history?
You seem to be trying to prove so. The TV show was doing a
good job implying so for WWII.
Post by MANITOBIAN
Are Australians ignorant of WW I and WW II history?
Not WWI, the Anzac legend is big and the 100th anniversary of
the Gallipoli landings is coming soon, so lots of publicity. Most
WWI documents are more readily available than WWII. Less
knowledge about WWII but the threat of invasion means there
is some basic information in the education system and beyond.
Post by MANITOBIAN
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
I would assume Mr Snow
Who and what is this Mr. Snow?
A person who said he was a military historian who assembled a
team and made a TV program that did WWII archaeology with
very incorrect narration. No DNA tests have been done but it
is highly probable Mr Snow is homo sapiens.

Geoffrey Sinclair
Remove the nb for email.
Bill
2013-03-13 14:41:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by MANITOBIAN
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
Dig WW2 TV series, by the looks of it meant as 4 episodes
of an hour each less time for advertisements. Featuring Dan
Snow, who says he thought he knew WWII but is now
discovering new things.
Meant for a Canadian audience with that bias, with the usual
problem of pictures chosen on how good the vision is, not how
accurately they match the narration, plus the footage is repeated.
Why would you claim that this was meant for a Canadian audience??
Are Canadians totally ignorant about WW I and WW II history?
Are Australians ignorant of WW I and WW II history?
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
I would assume Mr Snow
Who and what is this Mr. Snow?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Snow
Loading...