Discussion:
Enigma Question
(too old to reply)
Jim H.
2016-08-03 17:53:02 UTC
Permalink
I was re-watching 'The Imitation Game' this afternoon
(yep, I know it's a very simplified Hollywooded version
of the real story), but questions arose.

AIUI, there were several Enigma systems in use. For the
various systems, who in Germany decided what the machine's
settings were to be on a daily basis, how was this setting
selection made, and how was it sent out to the end users
in the field?

Thanks.
Jim H.
john Szalay
2016-08-03 22:51:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim H.
I was re-watching 'The Imitation Game' this afternoon
(yep, I know it's a very simplified Hollywooded version
of the real story), but questions arose.
AIUI, there were several Enigma systems in use. For the
various systems, who in Germany decided what the machine's
settings were to be on a daily basis, how was this setting
selection made, and how was it sent out to the end users
in the field?
Thanks.
Jim H.
Speculation on my part,


U-boats were issued a settings book at the start of their patrol voyage.

reasoning:
when HMS Bulldog captured U-110 and recovered her machine and code books,
it allowed BP to read messages to the boats for as long as the book was
valid.
Don Phillipson
2016-08-04 20:17:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by john Szalay
Post by Jim H.
I was re-watching 'The Imitation Game' this afternoon
(yep, I know it's a very simplified Hollywooded version
of the real story), but questions arose.
AIUI, there were several Enigma systems in use. For the
various systems, who in Germany decided what the machine's
settings were to be on a daily basis, how was this setting
selection made, and how was it sent out to the end users
in the field?
U-boats were issued a settings book at the start of their patrol voyage.
reasoning: when HMS Bulldog captured U-110 and recovered her machine and
code books, it allowed BP to read messages to the boats for as long as the
book was valid.
Sir Harry Hinsley (a Bletchley staffer and later its official historian)
told a public meeting in 1997 "the Germans were operating concurrently
about 50 Enigmas . . ." (reported by ***@cix.compulink.co.uk
in this NG 8 Nov 1995.) Each independent German agency using cipher
machines issued its own periodical code books, showing wheel
and steckerboard settings for months ahead, i.e. differently for
OKW HQ, the SS, Abwehr, Navy (surface ships), Navy (U-boats)
perhaps dozens of different Army components, and even German
railways.

We are now into the third generation of Enigma literature, #1 being
by Ronald Lewin and David Kahn (1970s), #2 being the official
histories by Harry Hinsley and others, #3 inc. Hugh Sebag-Montefiore
(2000.) The OP's question might best be answered in histories by
Germans, but I do not know this lilterature.
--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Rich Rostrom
2016-08-05 13:51:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim H.
I was re-watching 'The Imitation Game' this afternoon
(yep, I know it's a very simplified Hollywooded version
of the real story), but questions arose.
AIUI, there were several Enigma systems in use.
There was one Enigma system. (Though from 1942,
the U-boats used Enigmas modified for an additional
scrambler wheel. One might call that a different
"system".)

However, there were many Enigma "keys". Each key
was a suite of daily settings, issued monthly to
all users on a particular key. There were separate
keys for the Army, Navy, Air Force, and military
supply service (initially). As the war continued,
additional keys proliferated - for the SS, for the
Abwehr, for different theaters, and for different
categories of units and operations within each
service.

Towards the end of the war, for instance, there
were separate Navy keys for

- general operations
- Mediterranean operations
- U-boat operations
- U-boat training
- large surface warships
- commerce raiders
- weather reports

and probably others. There were over 50 for all
services and branches.
Post by Jim H.
For the various systems, who in Germany decided what
the machine's settings were to be on a daily basis...
Some clerk in the central office of the Signals
division of OKW.
Post by Jim H.
how was this setting selection made...
Randomly, as far as anyone knows.

A key specified for each day:

Scrambler wheel selection and order
(The Enigma scrambler wheels were swappable;
they could be inserted in any order in the
three slots, and as the war continued additional
wheels were issued with each machine, allowing
for the use of any three of up to seven wheels.)

Position of the outer indicator ring on each wheel
(Each wheel had an A-Z ring on its outside to
indicate position through a window in the machine
cover. But the ring rotated relative to the actual
scramble wiring; it was secured with a clip in
operation. Thus if scramble wheel #1 was in slot A,
setting it to show X could still have 26 possible
positions.)

Plugboard connections
(The Enigma had a set of 26 sockets, which could
be cross-connected by double-ended cables. By
cross-connecting 4 to 10 pairs of sockets, another
layer of scramble was introduced. Though unlike
the effect of the scrambler wheels, the plugboard
was constant for the whole day, it was completely
variable from day to day.)

Discriminants
(These were three-letter tags sent in clear to
indicate what key the message was in. Each key had
a set of four; all were used. For multipart messages,
successive parts were tagged with different
discriminants.)

That clerk had to generate all those settings for
all the different Enigma keys.

But see below.
Post by Jim H.
and how was it sent out to the end users in the field?
In printed booklets, I'd presume. For a month at
a time, except naval units on long deployments.

----------------------------------------------

Gordon Welchman was one of the top people at "Station
X", the British cryptanalysis center at Bletchley
Park. His field was mathematical attacks on Enigma,
including the development of mechanical systems (the
famous "bombes", which could test tens of thousands of
possible settings against a cipher message).

He wrote a memoir called _The Hut Six Story_, in which
he discussed the problems faced by the cryptanalysts
and how they overcame them. He noted that the Allies
would not have been able to break Enigma without major
German mistakes. The story below is taken from his
book.

As the war progressed, and the keys proliferated, that
clerk in Berlin (Welchman dubbed him "Herr X") had
more and more work to do, and one day he said "the
hell with it." He adopted a clever labor-saving trick:
recycling elements of old keys. He would take the
wheel order from an old Navy key, the ring settings
from an old Army key, the plugboard connection from an
old SS key, and issue the result to the Luftwaffe. Who
would ever know?

As it happened, Reg Parker, an analyst at Bletchley
Park, was keeping a log of all solved Enigma keys,
just to see if any patterns appeared. When Herr X said
"the hell with it", Reg Parker caught him.

Thus for much of 1942, Bletchley Park often had parts
or all of many Enigma keys for up to a month in
advance.
--
The real Velvet Revolution - and the would-be hijacker.

http://originalvelvetrevolution.com
Geoffrey Sinclair
2016-08-05 13:51:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim H.
I was re-watching 'The Imitation Game' this afternoon
(yep, I know it's a very simplified Hollywooded version
of the real story), but questions arose.
AIUI, there were several Enigma systems in use. For the
various systems, who in Germany decided what the machine's
settings were to be on a daily basis, how was this setting
selection made, and how was it sent out to the end users
in the field?
There were large numbers of engima "circuits" in operation,
depending on what time of the war you are talking about. The
machines became more complex, plug boards, extra wheels
and spare wheels.

The relevant signals sections decided the settings and how
long those settings were to be valid for. Daily changes were
routine. The signals people would courier the relevant materials
to their units.

Then came the compromise between the logistics of distributing
code materials and the amount of exposure should the enemy
capture the material. Ships planning to be at sea needed settings
that lasted the planned length of their voyage. Emergency settings
were needed in case a breech was suspected. There should have
been a master agreement to make sure different agencies had
different settings at all times.

In summary the relevant signals organisations laid down policy
and issued materials according to the policy, which varied between
"circuits". Disguised raiders expecting to be at sea for many months
had different requirements to say the German rail system, including
how easy it was to change things. How much detail is required?

Geoffrey Sinclair
Remove the nb for email.

Loading...